Portable oxygen concentrators versus oxygen cylinder during walking in interstitial lung disease: A randomized crossover trial

AuthorsKhor, Y.H.
McDonald, C.F.
Hazard, A.
Symons, K.
Westall, G.
Glaspole, I.
Goh, N.S.L.
Holland, A.E.
TypeJournal Article (Original Research)
JournalRespirology
PubMed ID28544460
Year of Publication2017
URLhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28544460
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/resp.13083
Download Khor_et_al-2017-Respirology.pdf (461.3 KB)
AbstractBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Ambulatory oxygen therapy is often provided to patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Lightweight portable oxygen concentrators (POCs) provide an alternative to traditional portable systems such as compressed oxygen cylinders; however, their efficacy in patients with ILD has not been assessed. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of three ambulatory oxygen systems (two different POCs and a compressed oxygen cylinder) during 6-min walk tests (6MWTs) in patients with ILD and exertional desaturation. METHODS: A total of 20 participants with ILD of varying aetiologies who demonstrated exertional desaturation to <90% on room air during 6MWT were recruited. Each participant performed two 6MWTs while breathing room air. On a subsequent day, two further 6MWTs were performed, in random order: one breathing oxygen via a POC (either the Inogen One G2 POC or the EverGo POC at the setting of 6) and one with a compressed oxygen cylinder (at 5 L/min). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in nadir oxygen saturation (SpO2 ) during 6MWTs using different portable oxygen devices (Trial 1: mean SpO2 for Inogen One G2 POC: 82.3 +/- 3.5% vs oxygen cylinder: 80.3 +/- 2.2%, P = 0.14; Trial 2: mean SpO2 for EverGo POC: 85.7 +/- 7.7% vs oxygen cylinder: 86.1 +/- 6.1%, P = 0.79). The mean 6-min walk distances were not significantly different among the three devices. CONCLUSION: The performance of the Inogen One G2 POC and the EverGo POC had comparable performance with that of the compressed oxygen cylinder during walking in patients with ILD and exertional desaturation.

http://www.ibas.org.au/what-we-do/publications/3872916


< More publications



Respiratory Biomarkers in Motor Neurone DiseaseRESPIRATORY BIOMARKERS IN MOTOR NEURONE DISEASE

The inability to breathe is unfortunately the most common cause of death in people living with Motor Neurone Disease (MND). Last year, our clinical research group in Melbourne reported that breathing...

Notch monitoring in sleepNOTCH MONITORING IN SLEEP

Sleep apnea is a condition where breathing is abnormal during sleep. There are two main forms of sleep apnea: obstructive and central. For obstructive sleep apnea, breathing is reduced because the airway...

ResearchFest 2026RESEARCHFEST 2026

ResearchFest 2026 at Austin Health launched new research flagships and honored Professor Mark Howard (Distinguished Scientist) and Professor Eliza Hawkes (Women in Research Award), with insights from Peter Doherty.

Championing Sleep Research!CHAMPIONING SLEEP RESEARCH!

We are announcing exciting updates to our Early and Mid-Career Researcher (EMCR) representation at the Institute for Breathing and Sleep (IBAS). The MSRC extend a warm thank you to Charissa Zaga and welcome Jessica Manousakis!

ANZSRS Life Membership for Danny BrazzaleANZSRS LIFE MEMBERSHIP FOR DANNY BRAZZALE

Danny Brazzale has earned a prestigious ANZSRS Life Membership—held by only 11 people—for his global leadership and dedicated mentorship in respiratory science.

Perth Highlights: TSANZSRS 2026PERTH HIGHLIGHTS: TSANZSRS 2026

A huge congratulations to all our team members who participated in the excellent workshops and meetings at the TSANZSRS Annual Scientific Meeting in Perth in March 2026! Well Done!

Institute for Breathing and Sleep

Level 5, Harold Stokes Building, Austin Health
145 Studley Road
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084

(03) 9496 5390

Email Us

Donate